In the January 28, 2005 Wall Street Journal author Jared
Sandberg talked about some “technology assisted” embarrassments in remote
meetings. For the most part he talks
about conference calls. But what other challenges and opportunities
do you get when communication is extended to other real-time technologies?
I have had the “pleasure” of seeing next-generation
communications technology cause completely brand-new embarrassments. Jared, you think just hearing a toilet flush
can interrupt a conference call? That is
merely the beginning my friend!
The “intimacy” of one’s office or cubicle, just like that of an automobile, gives people false comfort to do things that they wouldn’t dare do in a boardroom. Let’s just say that I have seen more than one senior level executive blatantly “digitally probing his proboscis” in desktop-based online meetings.
After the real-time technology melts away, you can “forget” where you are. And this is a wonderfully double-edged sword. The nose-picking example is one bad edge of that sword. But on the positive edge, once the technology “melts away” the quick, interactive, and challenging aspects of an in-person class or meeting easily transfer online. In fact, there can actually be advantages.
For example, on the cultural front, I have personally found that when I am training non-native English speakers online the kinds of questions and challenges that appear in text chat along with the video and presentation are far deeper and more frequent than when I do the exact same training in person. To me, it is obvious that the comfort of distance and typed English make the remote trainees more open to discussion.
There are also technology set-up issues that can cause
interruption. Sometimes people just
don’t know how to prop up their PC’s webcam in a way that it aims at the right
thing. Imagine that your camera is on
your desk and your head is two feet higher than desk level. Once again, a kind of nose-cam can jump in
(really I am not obsessed with noses).
Less offensive, but equally annoying is the lampcam – when
the camera aims right into a light or a window so that we see not the
participant, but a bright halo of light (better than the nose-cam, but still
not business and classroom appropriate). And, when people are working at home, we often get the kid-cam, the
cat-cam, the UPS-man-cam, or the “I am eating in front of the camera-cam.” Some can be cute and enhance the meeting,
some can get you nauseous.
In a “real classroom” you can’t, for the most part, instant
message other students in the room to give them a running commentary to agree or disagree with the teacher (or chat
about football) without other people in the room knowing. With Internet conferencing you can. Again, a double-edged sword. On the upside a co-teacher or student can
coach the presenter online in real-time when they are confusing or a student
needs support from another to clarify a point. On the downside the students can chat about sports instead of focusing
on math.
In a “real meeting” you can’t cover up the video and data
windows with your e-mail, your other work, or even a video game and just
“listen in the background”. With online “rich
media conferencing” you can. This is
great for boring unimportant meetings that don’t demand 100% of your
attention. But this is bad if you are
the presenter of some important and compelling stuff but you your students
don’t have the focus and self-control to pay attention.
In a “real meeting” people can’t accidentally or
purposefully log-in with a “handle” or “screen name” that makes it hard to quickly
identify participants. All kinds of
short-term havoc can be caused by this one.
One online class inefficiency is not apparent until you
actually host a data only conference where one presenter sends out slides or
spreadsheets and everyone else can just watch. As a presenter, you rarely know who is really paying attention because
you can neither hear nor see the remote participants. And, if the audio portion is on a conference
call, it is hard to determine who is speaking without interruption or setting
up a proper ettiquette. Worse, as
insinuated by Jared’s example, the presenter will choose to mute EVERYONE to
keep order (and keep out hold music) – but this makes it harder to have an
impromptu back-and-forth interaction.
Feedback mechanisms like text chat can actually distract you
from your presentation. Mostly though,
the dynamic of sitting at your desk and talking into a microphone while
presenting (yet not hearing anyone else) can be disconcerting at least and
debilitating at worst until you become practiced at it.
Best,
Gary at 6by7 Reports
Nice site!
Posted by: Katie | July 16, 2007 at 05:04 PM
You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it.h
Posted by: rty | August 06, 2007 at 11:58 AM
Pretty nice site, wants to see much more on it!
Posted by: marshal | August 18, 2007 at 08:14 PM
Thank you!
Posted by: Nicole | September 12, 2007 at 08:07 PM
Nice effect.b
Posted by: mason | October 06, 2007 at 01:38 AM
This is a great tutorial thanks!s
Posted by: richard | October 10, 2007 at 05:08 PM
Your guestbook is example of middle-class guestbooks. Congratulation! I値l show your site and guestbook to my friends.t
Posted by: sveta | February 09, 2008 at 04:27 PM
In many business meetings I think video chat is more of a distraction than an enhancement.
Posted by: Michael | June 09, 2009 at 11:09 AM